Sustainable transport infrastructure in a world of growing trade and climate change

SDG indicators
SDG target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all
SDG indicator 9.1.2: Passenger and freight volumes, by mode of transport (Tier I)

Transport infrastructure links the world economy and is an important determinant of growth for business opportunities, employment, industrialization and rural-urban linkages. Road networks, railways, airports, inland and sea ports, cross-border and other facilities are critical elements for trade competitiveness and integration into the world economy. They enable market access by bringing together consumers and producers, connecting global supply chains, increasing market size, promoting regional integration and attracting investment (African Development Bank et al., 2014).

But not all transport infrastructure brings equal benefits. In this context, building more sustainable and resilient transport infrastructure is vital. There is growing pressure to promote economic efficiency, resource conservation, social inclusiveness and environmentally-friendly solutions when building transport infrastructure. There should be a shift to sustainable maritime and inland transport infrastructure that minimizes negative externalities and support low-carbon activities (see Signs of a greening economy?) while staying resilient to disruption, including from climatic factors, weather events and security threats.

For this reason, SDG target 9.1 seeks to improve infrastructure that supports economic activity and human well-being while promoting sustainability. Specific to transport infrastructure, SDG indicator 9.1.2 measures “passenger and freight transport, by mode of transport.”

Maritime freight keeps expanding, driven by global trade

Transport services handle passengers and freight domestically and across borders. There are several major modes of transport (road, rail, air, sea and other waterways) and they all have important interactions with other sectors, contributing to economic activity and human well-being.

This section covers seaborne freight transport as one of the main supports of international value chains and global trade. Indeed, maritime transport handles over 80 per cent of global trade by volume (UNCTAD, 2018a). This mode of transport can be seen as the network that meets the world’s consumption and production needs by delivering energy, intermediate inputs and final products.

According to UNCTAD estimates, the volume of international maritime trade grew by four per cent in the year 2017, taking the total to almost 10.7 billion tons (UNCTAD, 2018a). As shown in figure 1, this represents a 50 per cent increase on the volumes transported in 2005. Major dry bulk commodities accounted for the largest share, almost reaching one third of total cargo. This was closely followed by fuels.

Containerized trade volumes reached 1.8 billion tons in 2017, accounting for 17 per cent of total maritime trade. This segment, closely associated with the globalization and fragmentation of global production, has been the most dynamic sector, registering a growth of 5.8 per cent in 2017.

Figure 1. Volume of international maritime cargo
(Billions of tons loaded)

Source: UNCTAD (2018a), figure 1.1.

Developing economies continue to account for most international seaborne cargo flows, as shown in figure 2. In 2017, this group of economies was responsible for 60 and 63 per cent of total goods loaded (export volumes) and goods unloaded (import volumes), respectively. Developed economies, by contrast, saw their share of both flows decline over recent years, so that they now only represent about one third of world seaborne imports and exports. Transition economies continue to be reliant on the export of bulky raw materials and commodities (about six per cent of total goods loaded), but they only hold a marginal share of global seaborne imports (less than one per cent of total goods unloaded in 2017).

Figure 2. World seaborne trade by direction and group of economies
(Billions of tons)

Map 1 highlights the leading influence of Asia in maritime transport. In 2017, this region shipped 42 per cent and received 61 per cent of world maritime cargo. Corresponding figures for Europe were 17 per cent of total goods loaded and 20 per cent of total goods unloaded. The other regions were responsible for smaller shares of worldwide maritime cargo flows.

Map 1. International maritime cargo flows by region, 2017
(Billions of tons)

Source: UNCTAD (2018b).
Note: Europe includes the Russian Federation and French overseas departments.

Demand for maritime transport infrastructure and services is a derived demand, impacted by demographic factors, consumption needs, industrial activity, trade and economic growth. Maritime cargo volume is, therefore, expected to rise in line with expanding economic activity. UNCTAD projects maritime freight to increase at an annual growth rate of 3.8 per cent over the next five years (UNCTAD, 2018a). At this pace, global seaborne trade volumes are expected to double in less than two decades. Large infrastructure projects, such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative, are expected to further boost maritime cargo flows.1

Efficiency goes hand in hand with connectivity

The projected expansion of maritime cargo volumes and the growing role of developing countries in seaborne activities will test the capacity of existing infrastructure and services. To support increased cargo flows, countries must continue to develop new infrastructure and optimize the use of existing networks. To remain competitive and avoid the risk of marginalization, ports and terminals must find effective ways to embrace sustainability and resilience.

Enhancing port infrastructure and service quality is crucial for reducing transport costs, and this in turn can increase connectivity, facilitate trade and boost trade flows. Figure 3 shows country scores for efficiency of seaport services and linear shipping connectivity in 2018. The two variables are positively correlated, with some of the more connected countries also registering high port efficiency, namely Singapore, the Netherlands, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, the United States and the Republic of Korea. Some exceptions include countries with very efficient ports but that, being located away from the main maritime trading routes, are relatively weakly connected, such as Finland, Estonia, Iceland, Norway and New Zealand. China’s maritime transport sector is a special case: it is by far the most well-connected country, but its port efficiency is close to the world average. With an average efficiency of 3.0 and an average connectivity reaching only 11.0, LDCs lie at the bottom of the table in both measures. With average scores of 3.8 and 18.5 on efficiency and connectivity, respectively, SIDS perform relatively better, but still significantly below the world average (4.3 and 39.8 for each measure, respectively). Thus, not all countries are equal from the perspective of efficiency and connectivity in maritime transport infrastructure.

Figure 3. Characteristics of maritime transport services, 2018
Source: Efficiency of seaport services is obtained from World Economic Forum (2018); linear shipping connectivity from UNCTAD (2019a).
Notes: The score for efficiency of seaport services ranges from one to seven. The linear shipping connectivity index takes the value of 100 for the maximum of 2004. For both variables, a higher value indicates a better result.

Logistical bottlenecks and insufficient investment are some of the key challenges in maritime transport infrastructure. They raise costs, extend delays, reduce access, constrain connectivity and undermine effective participation in regional global supply chains and transport networks. Beyond ports, road and rail networks are necessary for the door-to-door transport of goods. These additional services can render transportation costly, especially for LLDCs. According to UNCTAD estimates for the period from 2005 to 2014, total freight costs (including all modes of transport) in Africa reached 11.4 per cent of the value of imports. These costs amounted to 9.6, 9.0 and 8.0 per cent of the import value in developing economies in Oceania, Asia and the Americas, respectively. The equivalent rate for developed economies was only 6.8 per cent (UNCTAD, 2015).

Investment requirements in the transport sector will likely accelerate

According to recent projections, global infrastructure investment needs up to 2040 could reach US$94 trillion, in 2015 prices. A scenario in which current investment trends are maintained implies that only US$79 trillion will be invested, leaving a global infrastructure investment gap of US$15 trillion (Oxford Economics and Global Infrastructure Hub, 2017). This estimate is based on data from seven sectors in 50 countries. Available estimates specific to the transport sector also reveal high investment needs over the coming decades.2

The public sector has traditionally played a key role in financing transport infrastructure. However, investment requirements are large and there is a growing gap between needs and actual investment. In many countries, financing transport infrastructure needs is challenged by competition with other high-priority areas for public funds, by constrained opportunities for domestic resource mobilization and by limited ability to borrow domestically or internationally. Alleviating the persistent transport infrastructure gap and ensuring proper service delivery require further mobilization of domestic resources (public and private), and complementing them with additional sources, including foreign direct investment, international debt finance, development aid, as well as public-private sector solutions in the form of public-private partnerships (PPPs), among others.

Adapting transport infrastructure in times of climate change

UNCTAD has worked on the implications of climate change for maritime transportation since 2008, with increasing focus on climate change adaptation and resilience building for seaports and other key coastal transport infrastructure. In keeping with the global momentum of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on climate change, UNCTAD is intensifying its efforts to promote sustainable and resilient freight transport infrastructure and services.3

Transport infrastructure is affected directly and indirectly by climate change, with broader consequences for international trade and the development prospects of the most vulnerable nations.4 Climate-related extreme events and disasters can result in significant economic costs. They are considered among the top global economic risks, with implications for additional infrastructure investment needs and climate adaptation (World Economic Forum, 2019).

Figure 4 illustrates the potential probability that a disaster leads to damage on infrastructure, based on occurances in the past. The figure suggests that, within economic infrastructure, transport is the sector that is most vulnerable to disasters. On average, transport facilities have a 20-30 per cent probability to be impacted by geological, hydrological and meteorological events. Some of these events are expected to increase in frequency and intensity as a result of climate change, with severe consequences for infrastructure. Indeed, a recent study estimated that global damage due to sea-level rise and related extreme events might amount to US$10.8 trillion per year, about 1.8 per cent of global GDP, for a scenario of 1.5°C warming by 2100. For a scenario of 2°C or more, the costs could reach considerably higher levels (Jevrejeva et al., 2018).

Figure 4. What is the probability that a natural disaster affects infrastructure?
(Percentage)

Source: UNCTAD calculations based on data from UNDRR (2019).
Notes: The probability shown in this chart is calculated as the number of disasters that damaged infrastructure, divided by the total number of disasters. It is calculated for each infrastructure sector and type of disasters. The source database provides an inventory of disasters and their effects for 82 economies during the period 2000-2013. For more information on the database, including the classification of disasters, see UNDRR (2019).

Adaptation and resilience measures are essential since they contribute to reducing the negative impacts of climate change. However, a recent UNCTAD port-industry survey on climate change impacts and adaptation for ports shows important gaps in data on resilience and preparedness among seaports worldwide (UNCTAD, 2017). Relevant information and adequate climate adaptation efforts are urgently needed for effective climate risk-assessment and adaptation planning of coastal transport infrastructure, especially for ports in developing (UNCTAD 2011, 2019f).

Adaptation is a particularly urgent imperative for SIDS. These countries are often particularly exposed and vulnerable to the impacts of climate change while, at the same time, they are more dependent than other countries on coastal infrastructure for external trade, food, energy and tourism. Climate-related extreme events, that are expected to increase in frequency and severity, may cause major disruptions to the connectivity of SIDS to international markets as well as to related economic sectors, such as tourism (UNCTAD, 2014; IPCC, 2018). UNCTAD has recently conducted vulnerability assessments for eight seaports and coastal airports in two SIDS in the Caribbean, Saint Lucia and Jamaica (UNCTAD, 2018c, 2018d) as part of a wider technical assistance project on climate change adaptation for coastal transport infrastructure in SIDS (UNCTAD, 2019d). The results of the assessment, which focused on operational disruptions and marine inundation risk under different climate scenarios, suggest severe climate change impacts on coastal transport infrastructure and operations from as early as the 2030s, unless further climate change adaptation is undertaken (Monioudi et. al., 2018; IPCC, 2018).

While central to development, transport can also have detrimental effects on the environment through air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, soil contamination, waste, noise, threats to land and water ecosystems and biodiversity, and others. Each mode of transport may entail a different combination of negative impacts on the environment. While maritime transport is the most CO2-efficient mode of freight transport, the large volumes handled by this sector and its projected expansion in the coming decades make it priority. For instance, according to different scenarios, CO2 emissions from maritime transport are expected to increase by 50-250 per cent in the period to 2050 (International Maritime Organization, 2015; OECD, 2010).

Promoting sustainable transport involves balancing the economic, social and environmental dimensions of the sector. More specifically, it involves transport infrastructure, services and operations that are efficient, safe, socially acceptable, universally accessible, reliable, affordable, fuel-efficient, environmentally-friendly, low-carbon, and climate-resilient (OECD, 2011; UNCTAD, 2018e).5

Notes

  1. This initiative pursues infrastructure development within and outside China and seeks to improve physical connectivity through enhanced transport networks. It will require large amounts of materials in the form of dry bulk commodities, steel products, cement, heavy machinery and equipment. The resulting infrastructure improvements could increase total trade among partner economies by between 2.5 and 4.1 per cent (Baniya et al., 2019).
  2. For example, OECD (2012) forecasts global investment needs (for airports, ports, rails and energy transportation) of US$585 billion per year from 2015 to 2030. PwC and Oxford Economics (2015) estimate that investment requirements in transport infrastructure will increase from US$557 billion in 2014 to US$900 billion in 2025 globally. Finally, Woetzel et al. (2016) projects cumulative investment needs in the sector over the period from 2016 to 2030 to amount to US$18.7 trillion.
  3. For additional information, see UNCTAD (2019b, 2019c).
  4. For some recent studies on these topics, see Asariotis and Benamara (2012); Becker et al. (2013) and UNECE (2013).
  5. For more information on UNCTAD’s current work on sustainable freight transport, see UNCTAD (2019e).

References

  • African Development Bank, OECD and UNDP (2014). African Economic Outlook 2014: Global Value Chains and Africa’s Industrialisation. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  • Asariotis R and Benamara H, eds. (2012). Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge. Routledge. United Kingdom.
  • Baniya S, Rocha N and Ruta M (2019). Trade effects of the New Silk Road: A gravity analysis. Policy Research Working Paper No. 8694. World Bank.
  • Becker AH et al. (2013). A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: A challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society. Climatic Change. 120(4):683–695.
  • International Maritime Organization (2015). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. International Maritime Organization. London, United Kingdom.
  • IPCC (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15.
  • Jevrejeva S, Jackson LP, Grinsted A, Lincke D and Marzeion B (2018). Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C. Environmental Research Letters. 13(7):074014.
  • Monioudi IN et al. (2018). Climate change impacts on critical international transportation assets of Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS): the case of Jamaica and Saint Lucia. Regional Environmental Change. 18(8):2211–2225.
  • OECD (2010). Globalisation, Transport and the Environment. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  • OECD (2011). Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: The Role of Ports. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  • OECD (2012). Strategic Transport Infrastructure Needs to 2030: Main Findings. OECD Publishing. Paris.
  • Oxford Economics and Global Infrastructure Hub (2017). Global infrastructure outlook. Available at https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/recent-releases/Global-Infrastructure-Outlook (accessed 5 June 2019).
  • PwC and Oxford Economics (2015). Assessing the global transport infrastructure market: Outlook to 2025. Available at https://www.pwc.com/sg/en/publications/cpi-assessing-global-transportation-infrastructure-market-outlook-to-2025.html (accessed 4 June 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2011). Ad hoc expert meeting on climate change impacts and adaptation: A challenge for global ports. Information note by the UNCTAD Secretariat. UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/2011/2. Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2014). Small island developing states: Challenges in transport and trade logistics. TD/B/C.I/MEM.7/8. Geneva. 15 September.
  • UNCTAD (2015). Review of Maritime Transport 2015. United Nations publication. Sales No. E.15.II.D.6. New York and Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2017). Port industry survey on climate change impacts and adaptation. UNCTAD Research Paper No. 2017/18. UNCTAD/SER.RP/2017/18. Geneva. December.
  • UNCTAD (2018a). Review of Maritime Transport 2018. United Nations publication. Sales No. E.18.II.D.5. New York and Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2018b). Handbook of Statistics 2018. United Nations publication. Sales No. E.19.II.D.1. Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2018c). Climate Change Impacts on Coastal Transport Infrastructure in the Caribbean: Enhancing the Adaptive Capacity of Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Saint Lucia: A Case Study. UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/2018/3. New York and Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2018d). Climate Change Impacts on Coastal Transport Infrastructure in the Caribbean: Enhancing the Adaptive Capacity of Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Jamaica: A Case Study. UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/2018/2. New York and Geneva.
  • UNCTAD (2018e). Sustainable freight transport in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. TD/B/C.I/MEM.7/17. Geneva. 12 September.
  • UNCTAD (2019a). UNCTADStat. See https://unctadstat.unctad.org/ (accessed 10 April 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2019b). Climate change and maritime transport. Available at https://unctad.org/en/Pages/DTL/TTL/Legal/Climate-Change-and-Maritime-Transport.aspx (accessed 19 April 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2019c). Transport infrastructure and services. Available at https://unctad.org/en/Pages/DTL/TTL/Infrastructure-and-Services.aspx (accessed 19 April 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2019d). Climate change impacts and adaptation for coastal transport infrastructure in the Caribbean. Available at https://sidsport-climateadapt.unctad.org/ (accessed 19 April 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2019e). UNCTAD Framework for Sustainable Freight Transport. Available at https://www.sft-framework.org (accessed 24 June 2019).
  • UNCTAD (2019f). Ad Hoc expert meeting on climate change adaptation for international transport: Preparing for the future. Available at https://unctad.org/en/pages/MeetingDetails.aspx?meetingid=2092 (accessed 24 June 2019).
  • UNDRR (2019). DesInventar Sendai. See https://www.desinventar.net (accessed 7 May 2019).
  • UNECE (2013). Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation for International Transport Networks. UNECE. ECE/TRANS/238. New York and Geneva.
  • Woetzel J, Garemo N, Mischke J, Hjerpe M and Palter R (2016). Bridging global infrastructure gaps. McKinsey Global Institute. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/bridging-global-infrastructure-gaps (accessed 26 April 2019).
  • World Economic Forum (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. WEF. Geneva.
  • World Economic Forum (2019). The Global Risks Report 2019. World Economic Forum. Geneva.
  • World Shipping Council (2019). About the industry. Available at http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/containers (accessed 19 April 2019).

Click on a star to rate this page!

Average rating / 5. Vote count

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Share this page: