UNCTAD sub-themes – UNCTAD SDG Pulse 2025 / UNCTAD SDG Pulse 2025 provides an update on the evolution of a selection of official SDG indicators and complementary data and statistics about the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs. Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:59:58 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 /wp-content/uploads/2019/01/cropped-apple-touch-icon-32x32.png UNCTAD sub-themes – UNCTAD SDG Pulse 2025 / 32 32 Multilateralism and trade /multilateralism/ Wed, 21 Jun 2023 15:41:39 +0000 /?p=2718

As the world navigates multiple, overlapping crises - from wars and climate disruptions to energy insecurity and fragile supply chains - trade remains a powerful enabler of sustainable development. Developing economies have demonstrated resilience, maintaining a stable two fifths share of global exports in goods and services. Yet this overall strength conceals persistent disparities. LDCs remain far from achieving SDG target 17.11, constrained by structural challenges that limit their integration into global markets. Services trade offers promising new pathways, particularly in digital and knowledge-intensive sectors. But its benefits are unequally shared: over half of all services exports from developing economies are generated by just five economies. Meanwhile, tariff escalation in high-value sectors, such as green technologies, continues to disadvantage countries seeking to diversify and move up the value chain.

These patterns highlight the need for a more inclusive and development-focused global trading system. Trade should be a force for shared prosperity, not geopolitical rivalry, as argued in the UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of UNCTAD 16 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Ensuring fairer rules, broader participation and stronger international cooperation will be essential to expand opportunities and make trade work for all, especially for countries still striving to overcome structural barriers and fully participate in the global economy. These goals were stated in the UNCTAD Bridgetown Covenant -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and remain relevant today; the following sections describe related challenges:

  1. Attaining the sustainable development goals through trade
  2. Most developing economies lost market share in services exports over the last decade; only a few leading exporters thrive
  3. The multilateral trading system has reduced tariffs but not tariff escalation
Multilateralism is the means to make all voices heard in a multipolar world.Read more on this in UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of 16th session of the Conference.

Global exports of goods and services remain highly concentrated among a few developing economies.

LDCs’ share in global services exports dropped from the 15-year peak 0.7% in 2019 to 0.5% in 2024.

Tariffs on raw critical minerals are lower than on electric vehicles using them.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Development finance /development-finance/ Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:09:56 +0000 /?p=3689

The persisting lack of financing for sustainable development is worsening in 2025. With ODA falling for the first time in five years (down 7.1% in 2024), and a stagnant overall FDI to developing economies, with declines in 2024 observed in Latin America and the Caribbean (-12%) and Asia (-3%), as well as a drop of SDG-related investments (-26%), heads of state and government gather at FfD4 this year to discuss how to reshape the global financial architecture for sustainable development. South-South cooperation, grounded in peer-to-peer partnerships, knowledge exchange and non-financial support, plays a critical role in sustainable development for all, reinforcing other mechanisms, especially through mutual support, cooperation and knowledge sharing. The Bridgetown Covenant -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
strongly emphasized the essential contribution of ODA, private investment, and South-South and triangular cooperation, in addressing the challenges related to development finance, including mounting debt of the most vulnerable economies.

Approaching UNCTAD 16, redefining international support to developing countries is high on the agenda. The following chapters address related challenges:

  1. Bringing South-South cooperation into focus: the journey to measurement
  2. With falling foreign direct investment, investment-promoting regimes increasingly more important to reach the SDGs
  3. Costlier debt servicing undermines the achievement of the SDGs
  4. Measuring illicit financial flows for stronger domestic resources
We need a global financial architecture that puts people and planet first.Read more on this in UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of 16th session of the Conference.

Early pilots showcase non-financial support is an essential South-South cooperation modality.

Investments in SDG-related sectors dropped 26% globally in 2024.

The external debt of developing economies reached $11.7 trillion in 2024.

Without reliable data, government efforts risk remaining ineffective or inadequate.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Diversification /diversification/ Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:12:57 +0000 /?p=3692

The process of structural transformation – reallocation of production factors from low-productivity, labour-intensive, and polluting activities to higher-productivity, skill-intensive, and sustainable ones -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
– is central to enhancing productivity and incomes to mitigate vulnerability to market shocks. With no sign of further industrialization in Africa and LDCs and stalled progress in manufacturing in most vulnerable economies, coupled with challenges in their digitalization, the role of digital technologies becomes even more important in diversifying economies and building resilient systems that are open, inclusive, and secure and benefit everyone. “Transforming the economies through diversification” is a critical element for inclusive prosperity -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

The two sections of this chapter discuss these issues drawing on SDG indicators and other official statistics:

  1. Structural transformation to mitigate persistent technology gap
  2. Digital technologies are key to economic diversification
The shifting international landscape underscores the urgency of rethinking policies for economic diversification, with a renewed focus on intersectoral linkages and regional integration.Read more on this in UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of 16th session of the Conference.

LDCs not on track to meet their SDG 9.2 target by 2030 in manufacturing value added and employment.

In 2024, the price of a mobile broadband subscription was equivalent to 5% of per capita GNI in LDCs.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Sustainability and resilience /sustainability-and-resilience/ Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:05:57 +0000 /?p=9680

In 1964, when UNCTAD was created, the risk of ecological disaster was hardly on the international agenda. Today, as we prepare for UNCTAD 16, persisting increases in greenhouse gas emissions threaten development progress and future generations’ opportunities to live in a sustainable world. Transport infrastructure, and in particular ports, are increasingly susceptible to climate-driven extremes, making adaptation and resilience building increasingly urgent. We must change course. Continuing the trajectory of climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution and ecosystems degradation will unravel progress on the SDGs, exacerbating hunger, poverty, conflict, disasters, and health crises.

The Bridgetown Covenant -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
emphasizes the need to enhance the sustainability and resilience of transport infrastructure and services, and to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation and greenhouse gas emissions. It advocates for promoting sustainable energy and providing developing countries access to environmentally sound technologies and recognises the importance of conservation and sustainable use of oceans, seas and marine resources, as key strategies for implementing the 2030 Agenda and achieving a sustainable economy. The two sections of this chapter discuss these sustainability and resilience issues drawing on SDG indicators and other official statistics:

  1. Uncertainty and disruptions are affecting maritime transport, its sustainability and resilience
  2. Emissions growth continues, threatening the Least Developed Countries the most
The poor pay the highest price for shocks, crises and their cross-border ripple effects.

Read more on this in UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of 16th session of the Conference.

Weather and climate-driven extremes pose increasing risks for global ports, making adaptation, resilience-building and DRR an increasingly urgent imperative.

If all regions were able to reduce their carbon intensity of GDP to around 200 g/$, global annual emissions would reduce by nearly 45%.

70% of the world’s disaster fatalities occur in LDCs.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Emissions growth continues, threatening the Least Developed Countries the most /resilience-and-risk/ Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:37:09 +0000 /?p=9696

SDG indicators

Goal 1: End poverty in all its form everywhere
Target 1.5: By 2030, build the resilience of the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic, social and environmental shocks and disasters.
Indicator 1.5.1: Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population.
Indicator 1.5.2: Direct economic loss attributed to disasters in relation to global gross domestic product (GDP).


Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.
Target 9.4: By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities.
Indicator 9.4.1: CO2 emission per unit of value added.


Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
Target 12.6: Encourage companies, especially large and transnational companies, to adopt sustainable practices and to integrate sustainability information into their reporting cycle
Indicator 12.6.1: Number of companies publishing sustainability reports.

Asia remains most emissions-intense region, but has improved the most over time

Despite increasing carbon dioxide emissions, progress has been made in all regions on reducing the carbon intensity of economies since 1990 (figure 1). However, 2023 saw a rise in emissions intensity in Developing Asia, Developing Africa and Developing Oceania. Developing Asia, while still the most carbon-intensive region, has achieved a significant 72 per cent reduction in CO2 intensity since 1990. Globally, carbon intensity decreased by 62 per cent from 1990 (936 g/$) to 2023 (357 g/$), indicating that CO2 emissions have grown more slowly than GDP.

Figure 1. Regional differences in carbon dioxide emission intensity are high Figure 1. Regional differences in carbon dioxide emission intensity are high
Carbon intensity (grams of CO2 per dollar (GDP at current prices)) (SDG 9.4.1)

Source: UNCTAD calculations based on -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and EDGAR Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
for CO2 emissions.

If all regions were able to reduce their carbon intensity of GDP to around 200 g/$, global annual emissions would reduce by nearly 45%.

If all regions were able to reduce their carbon intensity of GDP to around 200 g/$, global annual emissions would reduce by nearly 45%. The high carbon intensity in some developing regions highlights the need to support them in building sustainable infrastructure and adopt lower-carbon technologies to enhance energy efficiency and phase out polluting energy generation methods -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The higher carbon intensity in developing regions is partly driven by other regions’ demand for carbon-intensive final products. Developed economies generally have higher demand-based emissions than production-based emissions, making them net importers of CO2 emissions, while most developing economies are net exporters -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. As environmental policies vary by country, companies may relocate carbon intensive production processes globally, leading to "carbon leakage" -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. To prevent this, setting global environmental standards is crucial.

Disasters risk continues to expand, together with their impact on vulnerable populations

Greenhouse gas emissions from energy use and other sources have exposed the world to new and unprecedented levels of climate hazards, as warned by the latest Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The greater the scale and intensity of these hazards, the more likely they are to escalate into disasters. Preparedness is essential to face these events and reduce their impact. Unsustainable development, marked by persistent inequalities, increases both exposure and vulnerability to disasters. Without adequate preparation, countries risk having their development pathways disrupted by disasters.

70% of the world’s disaster fatalities occur in LDCs.

By carrying out a forensic analysis on the characteristics of latest disasters, UNDRR has shown that we can learn from them to build more effective resilience strategies. Data are essential in this process. Data show that the number of recorded disasters has increased fivefold over the period 1970 to 2021 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and that they will keep on expanding along with their impacts on human lives. From 2014 to 2023, an annual average of 2 028 people per 100 000 were directly affected by disasters, a 71% increase from 1 187 in 2005-2014-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Despite contributing the least to climate change, low-income economies have the most exposed populations; 70% of the world’s disaster fatalities occur in LDCs. LDCs, LLDCs and SIDS also suffer the highest disaster impacts (figure 2). In LDCs, the number of disaster-related deaths and missing persons (per 100 000 population) was 2.5 times the global average and in LLDCs 3.1 times higher. As population growth continues, developing countries are projected to have even higher numbers of people affected.

Figure 2. Two to three times more deaths from disasters in LDCs and LLDCs than global average Figure 2. Two to three times more deaths from disasters in LDCs and LLDCs than global average
Number of people per 100 000 population (annual average for 2014-2023), and economic losses as a percentage of GDP (annual average for 2015-2023) (SDG 1.5.1, SDG 1.5.2)

Source: -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

As of March 2024, 129 economies reported adopting national disaster risk reduction strategies, more than twice the 57 economies that had done so in 2015. This corresponds to 60% of LDCs, 64% of LLDCs and 72% of SIDS. 108 countries have also reported having adopted local risk reduction strategies -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Despite all these efforts, related economic losses remain stubbornly high. Direct economic losses have been reported to exceed $131 billion per year worldwide during 2015-2022 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. While this corresponds to 0.3% of global GDP, in LDCs and LLDCs the direct losses are over 1% of their GDP. Countries need to invest in multi-hazard early warning systems (in place in 113 countries globally as of October 2024) and capacity building further to reduce the human cost of disasters -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Everyday decisions in urban planning, infrastructure, poverty reduction and environmental management are key to determine the extent of damage provoked by hazard. These decisions concern also the private sector. Sustainable environmental and social practices need to be promoted and taken at all levels.

Adoption of the international standards facilitates significant progress in sustainability reporting across the world, including in developing countries

Over the past ten years, sustainability reporting has become the default for both the world’s largest companies as well as the largest companies in each country or jurisdiction, with 96% of G250 companies and 79% of N100 companies now reporting on sustainability -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The shift from voluntary disclosure initiatives towards mandatory reporting requirements, and the emergence of international standards (including the IFRS and various European standards -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
), facilitated significant progress in sustainability reporting across the world, including in developing countries -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. In the period of 2016-2023, the number of companies publishing sustainability reports increased almost 4 times with an average annual growth rate of close to 20%. This growth was observed in all regions, while Asia, Europe and North America maintained the largest share of companies reporting on sustainability supported by the established regulations at the national or regional levels.

Figure 3. Company sustainability reporting continues to progress Figure 3. Company sustainability reporting continues to progress
Number of companys publishing sustainability reports (SDG 12.6.1)

Source: UNCTAD and UNEP calculations based on -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Bringing South-South cooperation into focus: the journey to measurement /development-financing/ Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:10:24 +0000 http://vm-pluto:8080/?p=1554

SDG indicators
Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals

Target 17.2: Developed countries to implement fully their official development assistance commitments.
Indicator 17.2.1 Net official development assistance, total and to least developed countries.


Target 17.3: Mobilize additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources.
Indicator 17.3.1 Additional financial resources mobilized for developing countries from multiple sources.

Heads of state and government gather at FfD4 this year1 to reshape the global financial architecture for sustainable development. Amid mounting global challenges, from geopolitical tensions and related refugee crises to climate shocks and systemic financial risks, the conference seeks to catalyse a renewed commitment to equitable and resilient financing. While ODA to developing economies is failing to reach commitments, new solutions are sought. South-South cooperation, grounded in peer-to-peer partnerships, knowledge exchange and non-financial support, plays a critical role in sustainable development for all, reinforcing other mechanisms.

Official Development Assistance turning downwards, increasing the gap to agreed targets

Despite recent growth, longstanding aid commitments remain unmet. In 2024, ODA fell by 7.1% in real terms compared to 2023 – for the first time in five years – declining to $212.5 billion -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and representing just 0.33% of donor countries’ GNI2, a sharp reversal from previous modest gains.

For the first time in five years, ODA fell in 2024 (-7.1%).
For LDCs, 2023 marked a further ODA decline in an already stagnant decade (figure 1). These levels fall far short of what is needed to support sustainable development for all. Net bilateral flows to LDCs were $35 billion in 2023. The spending gap to achieve, for instance, education transformation was estimated at $5 756.8 billion for LDCs per year, and $20.6 billion for inclusive digitalization -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
3. ODA plays an essential role, often serving as catalytic funding in areas where private investment is scarce. For some vulnerable countries it is the only reliable source of external financing making it indispensable for achieving the 2030 Agenda.

Figure 1. The falling ODA has increased the gap: disbursements now less than half of what developed economies have committed to Figure 1. The falling ODA has increased the gap: disbursements now less than half of what developed economies have committed to
ODA as a percentage of GNI (SDG 17.2.1)

Source: UNCTAD calculations based on -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Notes: 2024 is not shown in the LDCs graph as ODA data by detailed recipient are not yet available.

The previous increases of ODA were driven by conflict-related aid, e.g., to Ukraine, and in-donor refugee costs, and their decrease has contributed to the fall in 2024. This decline was further impacted by reduced contributions to international organisations and lower levels of humanitarian aid. Amidst these shifts, ODA with climate objectives has gradually increased over the past decade, reaching nearly $50 billion in 2021/2022 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Climate finance, a broader concept accounting for both bilateral and multilateral flows, including export credits and other public funds and mobilized private finance, surpassed $100 billion annually for the first time in 2022, hitting almost $116 million -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Despite this strong growth, the urgency for developed economies to scale up climate finance provided to developing economies remains high, especially in light of evolving dynamics in international development cooperation.

South-South data supporting strategic allocation of resources to reach the 2030 Agenda

South-South cooperation, alongside other international development support, is key to achieving the 2030 Agenda, but is the only form of development cooperation lacking systematic data. This hampers its strategic management and the effective allocation of flows to achieve sustainable development.

Figure 2. UNCTAD has engaged in close collaboration with partners to advance work on SDG indicator 17.3.1 Figure 2. UNCTAD has engaged in close collaboration with partners to advance work on SDG indicator 17.3.1
Timeline: UNCTAD has engaged in close collaboration with partners to advance work on SDG indicator 17.3.1

Source: UNCTAD.

Momentum to measure South-South cooperation is rapidly building following the endorsement of SDG indicator 17.3.1 in March 2022 at the UN Statistical Commission -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, and its voluntary ‘Conceptual Framework to Measure South-South Cooperation’ -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Developed by the South for the South, the UN Framework can enable globally balanced, inclusive and representative information on development support through reporting of South-South data to the SDG indicator, first time alongside data on North-South flows which have existed for decades.

The new UN Framework enables globally balanced, inclusive and representative South-South data.

Interest in measuring South-South cooperation is quickly increasing. The first expert meeting in July 2023 in Brasilia brought together 16 member States, and in June 2024, 66 developing economies met in Doha. Four countries have reported preliminary South-South data in the ’Framework’ and eleven are pilot testing it in 2025 (map 1). Early data by pioneering countries confirm non-financial support as essential to South-South cooperation, with scholarships, humanitarian assistance and technical cooperation reported most frequently, targeting (ordered by number of reported activities) SDGs 4 (quality education), 9 (industry and innovation), 8 (decent work and economic growth), 17 (partnership for the goals) and 3 (enhancing health), showcasing the diversity of South-South cooperation.

Early pilots showcase non-financial support is an essential South-South cooperation modality.
UNCTAD leads a Development Account project4 carried out with the UN Regional Commissions, UNDESA, and UNOSSC to support countries of the South in collecting and reporting South-South data through the new Manual -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The project enhances developing economies’ capacities to collect data on their mutual support flows, and use it for multiple analytical, policy information and reporting purposes.

Map 1. Pioneering and pilot countries are driving South-South data measurement Map 1. Pioneering and pilot countries are driving South-South data measurement

Source: UNCTAD, ECA, ECLAC, ESCAP, ESCWA.

Note: Situation reflected on the map as of April 2025.

Notes

  1. 4th International Conference on Financing for Development Sevilla, Spain | 30 June – 3 July 2025; https://financing.desa.un.org/ffd4
  2. Developed economies have committed to a target of 0.7% of ODA/GNI and 0.15 to 0.20% of ODA/GNI targeted to the LDCs -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    .
  3. The cost estimates presented are extrapolated values derived by scaling a population-weighted median of per capita costs from sampled LDCs to total LDC population.
  4. Project website: https://stats.unctad.org/measuringSSC.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
With falling foreign direct investment, investment-promoting regimes increasingly more important to reach the SDGs /investment-flows/ Fri, 17 May 2019 12:33:43 +0000 /?p=2675

SDG indicators
Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals

Target 17.3: Mobilize additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources
Indicator 17.3.1 Additional financial resources mobilized for developing countries from multiple sources

Target 17.5: Adopt and implement investment promotion regimes for least developed countries
Indicator 17.5.1: Implement investment promotion regimes for LDCs

Bridging the financing gap to achieve the SDGs and facilitate long-term economic transformation requires effective mobilization and utilization of various financing sources. Many developing economies face challenges in mobilizing sufficient funds, often hindered by their inability to secure affordable borrowing for investment. As they transition to higher income groups, losing eligibility for concessional finance (or part thereof) can exacerbate these challenges, creating a greater incentive to engage in South-South cooperation, but also reliance on private financial markets.

Continued decline in foreign direct investment to developing economies

Global FDI flows reached an estimated $1.5 trillion in 2024, an apparent increase of 4%. However, this headline figure is distorted by financial flows routed through European conduit economies1. Excluding these intermediary flows, global FDI actually fell by about 11% year-on-year -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Global volatility of FDI appears to be flatlining in recent years, however FDI flows to developing economies, after having exhibited a flat trend since 2010, experienced a sharp increase in 2021-2022 (figure 1). 2023 saw a drop in FDI and 2024 remained flat compared to the year before for the global South, undermining progress on the SDGs, as these economies rely heavily on international financing. FDI declines in 2024 were observed in Latin America and the Caribbean (12%) and Asia (3%), while FDI increased in Africa, a record 75% rise -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Figure 1. Since the start of the 2030 Agenda, the only major FDI inflow jump to developing economies (2021-2022) is now losing momentum Figure 1. Since the start of the 2030 Agenda, the only major FDI inflow jump to developing economies (2021-2022) is now losing momentum
FDI inflows, billions of dollars (SDG 17.3.1)

Source: -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Investments in SDG-related sectors dropped sharply, by more than a quarter in 2024.

Greenfield project announcements, primarily in industrial sectors, saw a moderate increase of 3% in number, yet fell 5% in value. Despite the drop, the value of greenfield projects remained high ($1.3 trillion), second only to the 2023 record value, driven primarily by investments in data centres and data processing. -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-

Investments in SDG-related sectors dropped sharply, by more than a quarter in 2024. Investment flows to developing economies for infrastructure fell 35%, renewable energy 31%, water and sanitation 30%, and agrifood systems 19%. Only the health and education sector saw growth (25%) -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. This underscores the persisting gap in attracting FDI to developing economies.

Facilitating outward foreign direct investment key to achieving the SDGs

Mobilizing private sector finance is crucial to achieve the SDGs, with FDI playing a key role. FDI promotion is not solely the objective and responsibility of host economies; home economies can also support investment in developing economies and LDCs through dedicated OFDI promotion schemes. In this regard, SDG indicator 17.5.1 tracks the number of economies with OFDI promotion schemes for developing economies, including LDCs.

In 2024, at least 51 countries, including 21 emerging or developing economies, had in place at least one type of investment promotion mechanism for OFDI.

In 2024, at least 51 economies, including 21 emerging or developing economies, had in place at least one type of investment promotion mechanism for OFDI. This represented 71 per cent of developed economies and 15 per cent of developing economies. Among the economies with OFDI promotion mechanisms, an increasing number (27) had adopted schemes specifically targeting developing economies, including least developed economies. Globally, the most common mechanisms supporting OFDI were investment facilitation services (44 economies), followed by fiscal and financial support (38 economies), investment guarantees (35 economies) and State equity participation in foreign investment projects (25 economies) (figure 2).

Figure 2. Also in 2024, outward FDI promotion schemes towards developing economies, including LDCs, are predominantly provided by developed economies Figure 2. Also in 2024, outward FDI promotion schemes towards developing economies, including LDCs, are predominantly provided by developed economies
Number of economies with an investment promotion mechanism for OFDI, by mechanism (SDG 17.5.1)

Source: -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Notes

  1. Several European economies, including Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland, where FDI statistics are significantly affected by conduit financial flows, reported large fluctuations and negative numbers in 2023 and 2024. Fewer negative numbers in 2024 exerted a net positive effect on global flows of about $230 billion. -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Structural transformation to mitigate persistent technology gap /sustainable-industrialization/ Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:28:19 +0000 http://vm-pluto:8080/?p=1566

SDG indicators
Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Target 9.2: Promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and, by 2030, significantly raise industry’s share of employment and gross domestic product, in line with national circumstances, and double its share in least developed countries.
Indicator 9.2.1: Manufacturing value added as a proportion of GDP and per capita (Tier I)
Indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (Tier I)


Target 9.5: Enhance scientific research, upgrade technological capabilities of industrial sectors in all countries, in particular developing countries, including, by 2030, encouraging innovation and increasing the number of research and development workers per 1 million people and public and private research and development spending.
Indicator 9.5.1: Research and development expenditure as a proportion of GDP (Tier I)

Structural transformation, a pivotal driver of economic development, traces its roots in scientific advancements centuries ago, inducing a differentiation of economic activity and a shift from raw material extraction to manufacturing, followed by a transition to services as economies mature -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Technological innovation, underscored by international cooperation, plays a vital role in this process -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. According to -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, the transition to manufacturing is completed when GDP per capita reaches around $13 000 at 2005 prices and manufacturing accounts for around one fifth of value added. An that basis, -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
defines industrialized economies as those with manufacturing value added exceeding $2 500 per capita, adjusted to purchasing power parities.

Structural transformation enhances productivity and incomes while fostering diversification of production, thereby mitigating vulnerabilities to market shocks. The Bridgetown Covenant -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
identifies “transforming the economies through diversification” as a critical element for inclusive prosperity. Access to requisite technologies, particularly in an increasingly digitalized landscape, is vital for successful structural transformation. The Covenant emphasizes that industrialization must align with sustainability and inclusiveness to realize the goals of the 2030 Agenda while ensuring equitable distribution of its benefits.

No sign of further industrialization in Africa and LDCs

Manufacturing value added per capita 25 times higher in developed economies than in Africa.

In 2023, manufacturing value added per capita in developed economies amounted to $5 379 (at constant 2015 prices), significantly surpassing other regions (figure 1). It was 3.5 times higher than in developing Asia and Oceania ($1 522) and 4.5 times higher than in developing Latin America and the Caribbean ($1 186). It exceeded the value in Africa ($212) by 25 times.

Over the past two decades, manufacturing value added per capita in developing Asia and Oceania has steadily risen to 3.2 times its 2003 value. Latin America and the Caribbean experienced a slower decline over the last decade. As a result, the region was overtaken by Asia in 2018. Africa has seen an increase of 20% over 20 years. Its manufacturing value added per capita only recovered to $215 in 2022, about the same level as before the COVID-19 pandemic. Developed economies, despite disruptions from the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, have generally exhibited modest and steady growth.

Figure 1. Manufacturing value added per capita: stable in most regions, rapid growth in Asia and Oceania Figure 1. Manufacturing value added per capita: stable in most regions, rapid growth in Asia and Oceania
Dollars in constant 2015 prices (SDG 9.2.1)

Source: UNCTAD calculation based on UNCTADstat -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

LDCs behind the target path towards industrialization

In 2023, manufacturing value added per capita in LDCs averaged $178, at 2015 prices, 30 times less than the average of the developed world. Despite this gap, LDCs have seen steady growth, with manufacturing value added per capita already 3.8 times higher in 2023 compared to 2005, with an average annual growth rate of 7.8% (figure 1).

Regarding SDG target 9.2, with a focus on the manufacturing value added as a proportion of GDP, LDCs made progress, increasing from 10.5% in 2005 to 14.5% in 2023. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the share stagnated at around 15% (figure 2). If the SDG target of doubling LDCs manufacturing share in value added by 2030 is applied to the LDCs of today, this target is unlikely to be reached. The required annual increase from 2005 onwards was 0.4 percentage points, but the actual average increase until 2023 was only 0.2 percentage points.1

LDCs not on track to meet their SDG 9.2 target by 2030 in manufacturing value added and employment.

While the manufacturing employment share in the current LDCs has followed a trajectory closer to the target path than its value added share until 2013, the gap between the actual and target paths expanded since. Since 2013, the employment share of manufacturing in LDCs has remained stagnant at around 7.6%. The relatively constant employment shares in LDCs alongside increasing value added imply an overall improvement in productivity, which can be considered as encouraging. However, it is essential to recognize that these are weighted averages, and incomplete data coverage likely masks variations in manufacturing employment and value added among different LDCs.

Figure 2. LDCs far from reaching the target of doubling the manufacturing share of value added and employment by 2030 Figure 2. LDCs far from reaching the target of doubling the manufacturing share of value added and employment by 2030
Percentage (SDG 9.2.1, SDG 9.2.2)

Source: UNCTAD calculations based on Global SDG indicators database -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Note: Target and target path set with reference to the base year 2005.2

Global R&D intensity increased, with high concentration in a few economies

The R&D intensity − that is R&D spending in proportion to GDP (SDG indicator 9.5.1) − was estimated at 2.0% in 2022 for the world, according to the UNESCO Institute of Statistics. This represents a more than insignificant increase in R&D intensity, from 1.6% recorded for 2010. The highest intensity in 2022 was registered in Israel (6.0%), the Republic of Korea (5.2%), and the United States of America (3.6%). Among developing economies, the leading economy was China (2.6%). -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-

In 2023, half of global R&D funds were invested in the United States of America and China alone.

R&D investment is highly concentrated in a few economies. Valued in PPP dollar, in 2022 and 2023, about a half of all measured R&D investment was spent in the United States of America and China alone -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Innovation attracts further innovation, and these two economies host the world’s largest innovation hubs (cities or areas). Regions with lower R&D intensity were Sub-Saharan Africa, Central and Southern Asia, and Latin American and the Caribbean. LDCs as a group invested an estimated 0.3% of their GDP into R&D in 2022 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Figure 3. Declining government contribution to global R&D funding relative to the private sector Figure 3. Declining government contribution to global R&D funding relative to the private sector
Global R&D by source of funding in PPP dollars (percentage)

Source: OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators database -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Notes: 2023 figures are UNCTAD estimates based on OECD statistics.

Preliminary data for 2023 indicate that government support has been on the rise for energy and defense oriented R&D. Overall, government share of R&D spending was dropping while businesses' investment in R&D has been increasing. -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-

Private business’ share in global R&D funding rising, while government’s share dropped from 30% in 2010 to 19% in 2023.

While governments tend to finance R&D activities oriented towards broader socio-economic goals, private funds may lean towards specific profit-oriented projects. In recent years, a major part of R&D funding was provided by business enterprises. Globally, their share was 58% in 2010, increasing to 65% in 2023 (figure 3). For some 8% of the total R&D value in 2023, the source of funds was not specified. The shares of private non-profit entities, higher education institutions, and sources abroad remained stable, accounting for 7%. The part provided for by governments dropped from 30% in 2010 to 19% in 2023 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. In line with the SDGs, it would be worthwhile for governments to pay attention to steering the R&D funding towards social and development goals.

Notes

  1. Vanuatu, the Maldives, Cabo Verde, Samoa, Equatorial Guinea, Bhutan, and Sao Tome and Principe were LDCs in 2005 but have graduated since then, due to their progress in economic development -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    . They are therefore not considered in the figures for LDCs above.
  2. In this report, progress in target 9.2 is measured with reference to the base year 2005. This is in line with the practice applied in the monitoring of the Millennium Development Goals, where the baseline was set to the year 1990, thus ten years before the adoption of the Millennium Development Declaration -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    . The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development does not specify any base year for target 9.2.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Uncertainty and disruptions are affecting maritime transport, its sustainability and resilience /sustainable-transport/ Wed, 06 Mar 2019 12:15:12 +0000 http://vm-pluto:8080/?p=1557

SDG indicators
Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Target 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all
Indicator 9.1.2: Passenger and freight volumes, by mode of transport (Tier I)

Infrastructure, including transport infrastructure, significantly impacts the attainment of all SDGs, influencing 92% of the 169 individual targets -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Transport infrastructure and services facilitate trade, support global supply chains, propel growth, and promote social progress. While multimodality is essential for door-to-door delivery of goods, maritime transport dominates, accounting for over 80% of world merchandise trade -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
1. The Bridgetown Covenant emphasized the strategic importance of transport for sustainable economic growth, regional integration, and developing countries’ participation in the global economy. It highlighted the need for resilient transport systems that can withstand shocks, recover and adapt to change, thereby fostering a more inclusive world and shared prosperity. Additionally, the Covenant stresses the need to enhance the sustainability and resilience of transport infrastructure and services, along with promoting the conservation and sustainable use of oceans and their resources -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Global maritime trade sustained as shipping and ports continue to navigate a shifting operating landscape

In 2023 and 2024, maritime transport and trade grappled with increased volatility and uncertainty against the backdrop of growing geopolitical risks and conflicts, heightened trade policy tensions, and climate change impacts, alongside an accelerated sustainability, decarbonization and digitalization global policy agenda -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Reconfigured shipping routes, capacity reallocation, increased distances and shifting trading patterns have become a new normal. Traffic passing through critical chokepoints, like the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal, was severely interrupted in 2023 and 2024 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The Red Sea continues to face ship rerouting onto longer routes around the Cape of Good Hope, with ship transits running 70% down on the regular trend -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

In 2023, maritime trade remained almost constant at 11.6 billion tons.

In 2023, maritime trade remained almost constant, while the long-term trend is increasing, at an average annual growth rate of 2.7% between 2000 and 2023. Volumes stood at 11.6 billion tons in 2023, below the 2021 levels, but only by 85 million tons (figure 1). Volumes are projected to grow by 2.0% in 2024 and on average by 2.4%, annually, until 2029 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Figure 1. Global maritime trade resilient amid disruption Figure 1. Global maritime trade resilient amid disruption

Source: UNCTADstat -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Note: Since April 2025, the seaborne trade figures have been compiled by a new method using official international merchandise trade statistics as main source.

Historically, developing economies served mainly as loading centres of low-value high-volume commodities such as oil and raw materials. Starting in 2000s, their maritime trade profiles have been shifting with their influence increasing and their maritime import share expanding rapidly. Since 2014, this share has been exceeding their share of exports (figure 2). Developing economies have now become major world maritime importers and exporters -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, playing a stronger role than in the past as users and suppliers of maritime transport infrastructure and services.

Figure 2. Importance of developing economies as seaborne trade importers rising Figure 2. Importance of developing economies as seaborne trade importers rising
Share of ports in developing economies in volumes of goods loaded and discharged at maritime ports (percentage)

Source: UNCTADstat -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Note: Since April 2025, the seaborne trade figures have been compiled by a new method using official international merchandise trade statistics as main source.

Container port traffic growing globally, despite regional variations and temporal fluctuations

Global maritime container trade rose by 217 million TEU over ten years until 2023.

In 2023, world container ports handled 858.2 million TEU, 217 million TEU more cargo than a decade earlier (see figure 3). In the last years, ports faced several disruptions including due to strikes of port workers, truck drivers and logistics operators, congestion caused by vessel rerouting, and a shift in port call patterns. As maritime transport decarbonization and energy transition goals solidify, ports are also repositioning themselves to enable the energy transition in maritime transport -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Many are embracing electrification, shore power, renewable energy, digitalization and automation to become smart -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, enhance efficiency and promote sustainability -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and resilience -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Figure 3. Volumes handled at world container ports rising Figure 3. Volumes handled at world container ports rising
Million TEU

Source: UNCTADstat -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Weather and climate-driven extreme events pose increasing risks for global ports, making adaptation, resilience-building and disaster risk reduction an urgent imperative

Ports are critical for global trade and sustainable development but are increasingly at risk of climate change impacts, ranging from heat waves to heavy precipitation, flash floods, extreme winds and waves, for example long waves and associated swell, that endanger the operation of cranes and can render access to ports more hazardous -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Mean sea-level rise and associated extreme sea-levels are especially concerning -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
due to their potentially devastating impacts on port infrastructure and operations -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Port defences are designed to withstand ESLs with a certain return period, commonly the 1-in-100 years ESL (ESL100), estimated at the time of design or construction. ESLs of a magnitude so far expected to occur once a century, will occur much more often under climate change, significantly increasing the flood hazard for global ports, including some of the 100 largest container ports (figure 4, see also -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
). Ports in developing regions, notably in SIDS, are particularly vulnerable and lack adaptive capacity -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, although these regions rely on critical coastal transport infrastructure as lifelines for their external trade, food and energy security, tourism, as well as for disaster response and recovery -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Effective adaptation action is particularly urgent as these assets are projected to be at high and increasing risk of coastal flooding, from as early as the 2030s -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Extreme weather events which are projected to increase in frequency or severity under global warming -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
not only cause significant damage but also disrupt global supply chains, leading to extensive economic costs and losses -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, with important implications for the sustainable development prospects of the most vulnerable nations -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Knowledge gaps persist, however, regarding individual coastal transport facilities’ vulnerabilities and exposure, hampering effective prevention and underlining the need for further research, guidance and capacity-building -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Figure 4. With global temperatures rising, ports will more frequently be exposed to extreme sea-levels of a magnitude previously expected to occur once a century Figure 4. With global temperatures rising, ports will more frequently be exposed to extreme sea-levels of a magnitude previously expected to occur once a century
Projected return period, Tr (years), of the baseline 1-in-100 years extreme sea level for top global container ports in 2021 under different global warming scenarios

Source: UNCTAD calculations. Data collation and treatment by I Monioudi, University of the Aegean. ESL100 projections for global coastline from -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
; see also -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Notes: Global warming scenarios SWL are presented in degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times. The Tr (years) - return period scale shows how frequent the baseline (mean of the 1980–2014 period) 1-in-100 years extreme sea level, ESL100, is projected to become for each port. Lower values indicate that the baseline ESL100 is projected to occur more frequently. Ports displayed are the 100 biggest ports in terms of container port throughput in 2021 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The ports are ordered according to region and exposure in the SWL 1.5°C scenario. The size of the circles is proportional to container port throughput in volume, in 2021.

Scaling up EWS early warning systems -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, as discussed in Resilience and risk, will be critical for increased preparedness and mitigation of impacts. Flexible and adaptive infrastructure and operations as well as engineered redundancy are crucial to improve resilience -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and to minimize and address loss and damage in coastal zones -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. While progress has been made in technical guidance -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
, standards -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
and methodologies -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
to facilitate risk assessment and adaptation, policy and legal frameworks play a particularly critical role in supporting the implementation of effective measure on the ground -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Climate-risk assessment in line with technical guidance -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
is already a legal requirement for infrastructure projects in the EU and EU-funded projects in third countries -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Urgent steps are required to bolster affordable climate adaptation finance for ports in developing countries -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The World Bank estimates that net benefits from investing in resilient infrastructure in developing economies amount up to $4.2 trillion. This is equivalent to a $4 return on each dollar invested in resilience -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. Out of the $116 billion of total climate finance provided and mobilized for developing economies in 2022, only $32.4 billion was for adaptation, and only a fraction of this amount will have been targeting climate change adaptation for ports and other critical coastal infrastructure.

Notes

  1. For more analysis of structural and cyclical changes affecting seaborne trade, ports and shipping see the annual UNCTAD flagship report Review of Maritime Transport -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    -—
    – ‒
    - –
    —-
    .

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>
Digital technologies are key to economic diversification /ict-development/ Wed, 06 Mar 2019 11:18:29 +0000 http://vm-pluto:8080/?p=1559

SDG indicators
Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

SDG target 9.c: Significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in LDCs by 2020
SDG indicator 9.c.1: Proportion of population covered by a mobile network, by technology (Tier I)

Digitalization has changed the way people produce, consume, trade and live. Narrowing the technological gap and closing the digital divide between and within developed and developing countries provides opportunities for improving incomes and resilience, as well as reducing the vulnerabilities, of the poorest – and in particular of women and youth. Past and ongoing crises have highlighted the role of digital technologies in diversifying economies and building resilient systems that are open, inclusive, and secure and benefit everyone.

It all starts with getting people and businesses online

51% of world population covered by 5G mobile networks in 2024.

To be able to engage in and benefit from the digital economy and digital trade, individuals and businesses must first be online. This means being covered by Internet infrastructure that is sufficiently fast and reliable, and furthermore by electricity infrastructure to power digital devices. By 2024, 92% of world population was covered by 4G mobile networks, double the share in 2015 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. However, there is considerable variation in 4G deployment between regions; while 4G is available to all in Eastern Asia and in Europe, only 54% of people in sub-Saharan Africa live in areas covered by 4G networks (map 1). Furthermore, mobile networks continue to evolve, with 4G being superseded by 5G technology which covered 51% of the global population as of 2024 -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
. The widest roll-out was in Europe, where 72% of the population was covered, followed by the Americas (63%) and the Asia-Pacific (62%). However, deployment has barely begun in many countries.

Map 1. More than half of the world’s population now covered by 5G, but deployment lags in some regions Map 1. More than half of the world’s population now covered by 5G, but deployment lags in some regions
Percentage of population covered by mobile network, by technology, 2023 (SDG 9.c.1)

Source: UNCTAD calculations based on -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Coverage alone is not enough

While 96% of the world population is covered by mobile broadband (3G or above) networks, many other factors create a gap between those who could access the Internet and those who do use it. In 2024, two thirds of the world’s population used the Internet, leaving 2.6 billion people offline. Furthermore, while almost all people in developed countries are online, only 35% of those in the least developed countries (LDCs) use the Internet -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

In 2024, the price of a mobile broadband subscription was equivalent to 5% of per capita GNI in LDCs.

One key reason is that the costs involved in getting online can be prohibitive for many. In 2024, the annual cost of a mobile broadband subscription was equivalent to 4.6% of per capita GNI in LDCs while a fixed broadband subscription equated to one sixth of GNI per capita -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
– both exhibiting a slight decrease compared to previous year. Given disparities in income distribution within countries, for many people connectivity will be even less affordable. Furthermore, the digital devices required to access the Internet, such as smartphones, also need to be available and affordable.

Additionally, the skills required to use the Internet must be sufficiently widespread and available amongst the population, and people need to be aware of the opportunities of the digital economy and of digital trade, especially those working at firms that stand to benefit from digital transformation. Finally, the speed provided by Internet connections and fixed line technologies, such as the fixed broadband, matters -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Digital technologies offer a vital opportunity for economic diversification

Digitally deliverable services account for over half of all services exports worldwide.

Digital technologies, including the Internet, underpin e-commerce – in which buyers place and sellers receive orders online. Additionally, they enable instantaneous remote delivery of services directly into businesses and homes. Both digitally ordered and digitally delivered transactions increasingly take place across borders. The possibility of engaging in such digital trade offers new opportunities for the diversification of developing economies. Digitally deliverable services now account for over half of all services exports worldwide. Their share grew especially during the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, then declined as exports of other services recovered, and stabilized in 2023, at a higher level than before the pandemic (figure 1).

Figure 1. Digitally deliverable services have increased their share in total services trade over the last 5 years Figure 1. Digitally deliverable services have increased their share in total services trade over the last 5 years
Exports of digitally deliverable services as percentage of total services exports

Source: UNCTADstat -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

Note: Digitally deliverable services are services that can be delivered remotely through computer networks. The figures in the graph cover: insurance and pension services; financial services; charges for the use of intellectual property; telecommunications, computer and information services; other business services; and audio-visual and related services.

Seizing the opportunities of digital trade requires not only investments in ICT connectivity but also actions to boost digital skills and awareness of the opportunities and risks associated with digital trade. Measures to facilitate digitally ordered goods transiting the border and regulatory actions to encourage digital payments, ensuring privacy and data protection, as well as the establishment of channels for recourse in case of loss or detriment related to digital trade, represent further enabling factors -—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
-—
– ‒
- –
—-
.

References

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
    Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
]]>