As the world navigates multiple, overlapping crises - from wars and climate disruptions to energy insecurity and fragile supply chains - trade remains a powerful enabler of sustainable development. Developing economies have demonstrated resilience, maintaining a stable two fifths share of global exports in goods and services. Yet this overall strength conceals persistent disparities. LDCs remain far from achieving SDG target 17.11, constrained by structural challenges that limit their integration into global markets. Services trade offers promising new pathways, particularly in digital and knowledge-intensive sectors. But its benefits are unequally shared: over half of all services exports from developing economies are generated by just five economies. Meanwhile, tariff escalation in high-value sectors, such as green technologies, continues to disadvantage countries seeking to diversify and move up the value chain.
These patterns highlight the need for a more inclusive and development-focused global trading system. Trade should be a force for shared prosperity, not geopolitical rivalry, as argued in the UNCTAD SG’s report ahead of UNCTAD 16 -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-. Ensuring fairer rules, broader participation and stronger international cooperation will be essential to expand opportunities and make trade work for all, especially for countries still striving to overcome structural barriers and fully participate in the global economy. These goals were stated in the UNCTAD Bridgetown Covenant -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—- and remain relevant today; the following sections describe related challenges:
Global exports of goods and services remain highly concentrated among a few developing economies.
LDCs’ share in global services exports dropped from the 15-year peak 0.7% in 2019 to 0.5% in 2024.
Tariffs on raw critical minerals are lower than on electric vehicles using them.
Heads of state and government gather at FfD4 this year1 to reshape the global financial architecture for sustainable development. Amid mounting global challenges, from geopolitical tensions and related refugee crises to climate shocks and systemic financial risks, the conference seeks to catalyse a renewed commitment to equitable and resilient financing. While ODA to developing economies is failing to reach commitments, new solutions are sought. South-South cooperation, grounded in peer-to-peer partnerships, knowledge exchange and non-financial support, plays a critical role in sustainable development for all, reinforcing other mechanisms.
Despite recent growth, longstanding aid commitments remain unmet. In 2024, ODA fell by 7.1% in real terms compared to 2023 – for the first time in five years – declining to $212.5 billion -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—- and representing just 0.33% of donor countries’ GNI2, a sharp reversal from previous modest gains.
Source: UNCTAD calculations based on -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-.
Notes: 2024 is not shown in the LDCs graph as ODA data by detailed recipient are not yet available.
The previous increases of ODA were driven by conflict-related aid, e.g., to Ukraine, and in-donor refugee costs, and their decrease has contributed to the fall in 2024. This decline was further impacted by reduced contributions to international organisations and lower levels of humanitarian aid. Amidst these shifts, ODA with climate objectives has gradually increased over the past decade, reaching nearly $50 billion in 2021/2022 -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-. Climate finance, a broader concept accounting for both bilateral and multilateral flows, including export credits and other public funds and mobilized private finance, surpassed $100 billion annually for the first time in 2022, hitting almost $116 million -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-. Despite this strong growth, the urgency for developed economies to scale up climate finance provided to developing economies remains high, especially in light of evolving dynamics in international development cooperation.
South-South cooperation, alongside other international development support, is key to achieving the 2030 Agenda, but is the only form of development cooperation lacking systematic data. This hampers its strategic management and the effective allocation of flows to achieve sustainable development.
Source: UNCTAD.
Momentum to measure South-South cooperation is rapidly building following the endorsement of SDG indicator 17.3.1 in March 2022 at the UN Statistical Commission -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-, and its voluntary ‘Conceptual Framework to Measure South-South Cooperation’ -—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—--—
– ‒
- –
—-. Developed by the South for the South, the UN Framework can enable globally balanced, inclusive and representative information on development support through reporting of South-South data to the SDG indicator, first time alongside data on North-South flows which have existed for decades.
Interest in measuring South-South cooperation is quickly increasing. The first expert meeting in July 2023 in Brasilia brought together 16 member States, and in June 2024, 66 developing economies met in Doha. Four countries have reported preliminary South-South data in the ’Framework’ and eleven are pilot testing it in 2025 (map 1). Early data by pioneering countries confirm non-financial support as essential to South-South cooperation, with scholarships, humanitarian assistance and technical cooperation reported most frequently, targeting (ordered by number of reported activities) SDGs 4 (quality education), 9 (industry and innovation), 8 (decent work and economic growth), 17 (partnership for the goals) and 3 (enhancing health), showcasing the diversity of South-South cooperation.
Source: UNCTAD, ECA, ECLAC, ESCAP, ESCWA.
Note: Situation reflected on the map as of April 2025.